Sacramental language in the Immanent Frame
At the end of my last post, I raised some concerns with the possibility of the kind of resourcement advocated by Boersma in his very interesting book, Scripture as Real Presence. It wasn't until, today, while having coffee with one of Boersma's former students that I was able to grasp the problem more clearly. In my last post I wrote: Is the recovery of the sort of sacramental, pre-modern exegesis possible today? If so, what would it look like? As a theologian, I appreciate the coup that this would be for a dogmatic account of Scripture, but can we actually reclaim the neo-platonic infrastructure necessary to support such an account? The genius of the Fathers was their ability to use the best philosophical tools at their disposal to fill out their theological claims about Scripture. In our post-modern context where we have witnessed the death of metaphysics proclaimed by Nietzsche et al, how do we go forward? Charles Taylor has expressed the ...