The Joy of Academic Reading: Why Wittgenstein and Derrida are not the same

Academic reading can be a chore. For some reason, experts often engage in a sort of linguistic torture that leaves readers bored, confused, and emotionally drained. But every so often, one encounters a piece of academic writing that makes the soul sing. This was the treat that awaited me today as I read Toril Moi's 2009 essay, "They practice their trades in different worlds": Concepts in Poststructuralism and Ordinary Language Philosophy."

Over the past year I wrote a thesis on Stanley Hauerwas that featured a chapter on his indebtedness to Ordinary Language Philosophy. I was frustrated by the constant criticisms of the "linguistic turn" in Hauerwas' work that often came from a group known as the "Biola School." Their criticisms seemed to me to be off-base somehow, but I could never quite articulate a satisfactory account of what these folks got wrong. I supposed that they simply had not undergone the Wittgensteinian therapy necessary to rightly read Hauerwas (which, in a sense, is true), but I knew that this was an insufficient argument to dismiss their complaints. I muddled through, and came up with something that was sufficient to have my thesis accepted and so I moved on.

As I read Moi's essay today, I realized at once what the issue was. To an untrained ear, there is considerable resonance between the Derridean Postructuralist approach to language and Wittgensteinian Ordinary Language Philosophy, but they are in fact quite some distance apart. One of the constant misreadings of Hauerwas that I encountered was that his "linguistic turn" left him stranded in language, unable to connect with the "real" world. Moi helpfully shows that while this is a potential shortfall in Derrida's appropriation of Husserlian accounts of language, Ordinary Language in fact takes us the opposite direction, connecting users of language more intimately with the world.

Reading Moi today was like a Damascus Road experience. The scales fell from my eyes and I was able to understand why the criticisms of Hauerwas by folks like R. Scott Smith and others never seemed to hit the mark; they had brought a critique of Derrida's deconstruction to an Ordinary Language game.

For those interested in Ordinary Language, I would encourage you to read Moi's essay that I have linked to above. I will leave you with a quote from the concluding paragraph:

For me, the greatest achievement of ordinary language philosophy is precisely that it gets away from the idea of language as negation, that it shows us instead that language is the very condition of possibility of lived experience; turning towards ordinary language, we turn towards the world, and towards others.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

And they saw the place

Sermon preached at St. Margaret's Anglican on August 21, 2022. Appointed readings:  Jer 1:4-10; Ps 71:1-6; Heb 12:18-29 Introduction If you have a Bible with you this evening, it may be helpful to have it handy as this will be one of those sermons that a friend of mine once described as “A Bible in one hand and more Bible in the other.” Now, I am far from a Greek scholar as my seminary transcripts can attest to, and I generally have a rule against appealing to biblical languages in the pulpit. But, just this once, I want to draw your attention to a little bit of text criticism as our way into our epistle reading this evening.   Our lesson from Hebrews begins “You have not come to something that can be touched, a blazing fire, and darkness, and gloom, and a tempest… etc.” But what is this “something” that is being referred to? The Book of Hebrews, true to its name, sets out to explicate the gospel of Jesus Christ by way of a close reading of the Hebrew scriptures. With that in mind,
Read more

Two Truths and a Lie - Faith Horizons 2023 (October 13th)

  Readings: 2 Chronicles 6:12-21; Matthew 5:1-10  Introduction “ Christianity has a very long history, and a lot of it is terrible. It’s tempting to deal with this history by disavowing it, by suggesting that real Christians would not do the kinds of things that actually-existing-Christians have done. ” (Marika Rose, Theology for the End of the World , 13) Have you ever played that ice-breaker game, “Two truths and a lie?” I thought that since I’m brand new as the Diocesan Discipleship Developer, I’d start off by sharing two truths and a lie about myself that you can come ask me about after the service. First, when I was a child, my family farmed ostriches for a few years. Second, I have a beautiful golden retriever named Duke. Third, my wife and I decided to sell our car back in 2020 and now enjoy the car-free life through a combination of cycling , transit, and a membership in the Peg-City Car Co-op . As I said, please come introduce yourself and let me know which of these you think
Read more

Refusing Talent

A sermon preached on Sunday, November 19, 2023, at St. Thomas, Morden. Propers 392; Jg 4:1-7; Ps 123; 1 Th 5:1-11; Mt 25:14-30. The British philosopher, Mark Fisher , once wrote, “It is easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.” Fisher was fascinated by the fact that while our society routinely creates movies about the world ending, in the world these movies depict, the basic realities of our capitalistic economy remain resolutely unchallenged, even as this economic structure drives the world to its destruction. Our moral imaginations are trapped, Mark Fisher argues, in a structure he calls “Capitalist Realism” - a situation in which we deeply believe that something like a capitalistic economy is fundamental to human nature. Rather than correctly seeing capitalism as a contingent economic structure that arose relatively recently in Western society, we instead are led to believe that this economic system just is how the world works. Capitalist accumulation, on t
Read more