The Nature of Theology

As part of the requirements for my MA, I had to write a paper on theological method. What follows is a portion from that paper as I attempt to articulate how I currently understand the work of theology. Many people have asked me how theology has effected my relationship with God - I hope that this short piece can serve as a gentle correction of the form of that question and show that theology is an inextricable part of the Christian relationship with the God who chose to reveal Godself as Father, Son, and Spirit.

I take theology to be the task of helping the Church say no more or less than must be said about God and our relationship to God. The second part of that task, articulating “our relationship to God,” is the easier of the two, as it is simply the exercise of working out how all of human knowledge inheres in Christ. Theology is the great “Queen of the Sciences” insofar as it is, far from being its own unique sectioned off form of discourse, a master discourse that attempts to articulate the relationship of all the contingent things that are in relation to the only One who is not a contingent thing. Theology is the language of creatures qua creatures, in their systematic recognition and naming of all that is as contingent gift from the Creator. This task requires a fair amount of word-care, and should be seen as a divine discipline in the renewing of the human mind in order to see the world aright.

The first part of that task, saying “no more or less than must be said about God” is a devilishly difficult task, especially because it is not always entirely clear what we mean by God.[1] Robert Jenson once wrote, “God is whoever raised Jesus from the dead, having before raised Israel from Egypt.”[2] This sentence provides a thick description of a God who acts in history and is never not who God is in the person of Jesus. This description of God is a far cry from the vague description found on the American dollar, “In God we Trust.” The work of theology is therefore the careful word-care necessary so that our sentences about God more resemble Jenson’s sentence than that of the Federal Reserve.


[1] My conception of the task of theology is probably overdetermined by the work of Stanley Hauerwas. As this is a report on my theological method thus far, I will be unapologetic about this fact, but I should note the two books of Hauerwas’ work that have particularly inspired my conception of theology along these lines, Stanley Hauerwas, Working with Words: On Learning to Speak Christian (Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2011); Stanley Hauerwas, The Work of Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015).
[2] Robert W. Jenson, Systematic Theology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), 63.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

And they saw the place

Sermon preached at St. Margaret's Anglican on August 21, 2022. Appointed readings:  Jer 1:4-10; Ps 71:1-6; Heb 12:18-29 Introduction If you have a Bible with you this evening, it may be helpful to have it handy as this will be one of those sermons that a friend of mine once described as “A Bible in one hand and more Bible in the other.” Now, I am far from a Greek scholar as my seminary transcripts can attest to, and I generally have a rule against appealing to biblical languages in the pulpit. But, just this once, I want to draw your attention to a little bit of text criticism as our way into our epistle reading this evening.   Our lesson from Hebrews begins “You have not come to something that can be touched, a blazing fire, and darkness, and gloom, and a tempest… etc.” But what is this “something” that is being referred to? The Book of Hebrews, true to its name, sets out to explicate the gospel of Jesus Christ by way of a close reading of the Hebrew scriptures. With tha...
Read more

Unsettling Settled Stories

One of the great coups of the modern world is its success in convincing us that we have no stories except the stories we chose when we had no stories. Beyond the fact that this is itself a story, the amount of storied infrastructure necessary to sustain this story is quite remarkable. Today, I want to unsettle one of the many stories that is largely a matter of settled "fact" in contemporary discourse. My purpose here is not simply to overturn the story, but rather to complicate it sufficiently in order that we can at least begin to question its settled nature and see just how silly some of our unquestioned assumptions can be. Today's story began, as near as I can tell, with the 1967 essay by Lynn White Jr., in the journal Science   "The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crisis." This essay is widely cited as a short-hand for blaming Christian anthropocentrism for our current environmental and ecological woes. Often, it seems that the people who cite this es...
Read more

Sin and its Liberal Deniers

The US elections loom above everything these days. There is a profound anxiety and exhaustion present in even the most ordinary public encounters. If this is the state of things in Canada, I can only imagine what our neighbours to the south are going through. Everyone seems to be holding their breath and shaking their heads, hoping that somehow things will turn out alright, knowing that even the best possible outcome is still quite terrifying. How did things get like this? How did a man who is objectively incompetent and singularly unsuited for elected office come this close to becoming the next President of the United States and the most powerful man in the world? While most liberal elites will shrug their shoulders and tell some story about the "uneducated whites" who form Trump's base, the answer is both more simple and more nuanced than that. The basic liberal belief is that education can and will solve all of society's problems. Lost your job? Re-educate yourse...
Read more